Find the Fastest Web Hosting Providers - Unbiased & Data-Driven

We are committed to providing you with accurate and unbiased data of fastest web hosting services. Our data is gathered through incognito testing, simulating the experience of a real customer. This approach ensures that hosting providers are unaware of our testing, preventing any special treatment or biased environments. The result is legitimate, reliable data you can trust. The table below is a reflection of this commitmentunbiased, non-manipulated, and tested as if we were everyday users.

Fastest Hosting Providers Data Table & Stats - Incognito Tested

* All providers are tested under same circumstances, with entry level plans, incognito, as customer, with same WordPress setup and no CDN involved.
* Providers are selected based on a blend of brand recognition and technological advancement, with a focus on high-speed hosting, allowing you to compare those extensively covered by biased reviews with those truly oriented towards performance.
* Providers are tested by sending 1, 100, 1000 requests at same time, average data is incorporated into table.
* We are not claiming who is the best; rather, we present you with their empirical performance, answering the question for you: 'Who is the fastest?'
THIS TABLE CAN NOT BE MANIPULATED, FABRICATED OR SET IN BIASED ENVIRONMENT.

Methodology for Web Hosting Performance Comparison

Our web hosting performance evaluations are conducted with a commitment to unbiased and accurate testing. Here’s how we ensure the reliability and relevance of our data:

• Non-Biased Testing: All tests are conducted independently. We do not receive compensation from any providers for testing, ensuring that our reviews are impartial and objective.
• Monthly Updates: Our data is updated monthly to reflect the most current performance metrics. This regular updating schedule ensures that our comparisons remain timely and relevant.
• Global Testing Locations: Tests are conducted from multiple locations worldwide, including the USA, Europe, and Australia. By averaging these results, we capture a comprehensive picture of global performance and reliability.
• Consistent Test Conditions: Each provider is tested using the same WordPress website setup without the use of a Content Delivery Network (CDN). This standardization ensures that all differences in performance are attributable solely to the hosting services themselves.
• Customer Experience Simulation (Incognito Testing): We subscribe to hosting services randomly and monitor them as typical customers. This approach prevents providers from placing us on specially optimized servers, thereby allowing us to experience and report the authentic customer experience.

By adhering to these strict protocols, we provide a trustworthy and practical guide to web hosting services, helping users make informed decisions based on factual and comprehensive data.

Scoring Formula Explained

Understanding our scoring formula is key to appreciating the detailed and fair evaluations we provide. Here's how we calculate the scores for each web hosting provider, with each metric carefully weighted to reflect its impact on overall performance:

• TTFB (Time to First Byte) Score: This is a crucial metric for user perception of speed. The score starts at 20 and is decreased by 3 points for every 0.1 second over the optimal 0.1 second threshold. For example, a TTFB of 0.2 seconds would result in a score of 17.
• Loading Time Score: Reflects how quickly content is delivered. The score starts at 20 and decreases by 1 point for every additional 0.1 second over the optimal 0.1 second. A loading time of 0.2 seconds results in a score of 19.
• Uptime Score: Critical for reliability, scored on a scale from 0 to 20. A perfect 100% uptime scores 20 points, with a reduction based on the actual percentage down to 98%, below which the score is 0.
• Response Time Score: Indicates the responsiveness of the hosting service. Begins at 20 and decreases by 1.5 points for every 0.1 second over the optimal 0.1 second. For example, a response time of 0.2 seconds results in a score of 18.5.
• Bandwidth Score: Given a flat score, where unlimited bandwidth receives a full 5 points and limited bandwidth receives 0 points.
• Backend Processing Time Score: Measures the efficiency of server-side operations. It starts from 10 and is reduced by 0.5 points for every 0.1 second beyond the optimal 0.1 second. For instance, a backend processing time of 0.2 seconds results in a score of 9.5.

Each of these scores is then summed to determine the total score for each provider, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation based on multiple dimensions of service performance.

This structured approach ensures each provider is assessed fairly and precisely on the same criteria.

Our Commitment to Unbiased Reviews

THIS HOMEPAGE, FEATURING THE TABLE WITH WEB HOSTING PROVIDERS, WILL REMAIN INDEPENDENT. PROVIDERS CANNOT DETERMINE WHO WE ARE OR WHEN WE ARE TESTING THEM.

We are committed to maintaining a platform that is NON-BIASED, NON-BRIBABLE, AND NON-MANIPULATIVE. The integrity of our reviews is paramount, and it is IMPOSSIBLE TO MANIPULATE our results. Our aim is to assist businesses, individuals, and developers in making informed decisions about their hosting services—this is our greatest success.

While we may discuss other providers in blog posts and explore their benefits, that will not earn them a spot in the performance table. Unfilteredly, we declare and acknowledge that we will not be placed in a biased environment, and that providers will not, in any way, be listed, tested, or have any impact on the Hosting Performance Table. Our reviews are based solely on performance data and factual analysis.